3 ms·
It's covered in the interview. The Russian state backed off when they figured that the only way to ban Telegram is to also break large pieces of the country's d
by sam_lowry_ 1y ago
It's covered in the interview. The Russian state backed off when they figured that the only way to ban Telegram is to also break large pieces of the country's digital infrastructure, because Telegram was using Cloudflare, Google Cloud, AWS, Hetzner address ranges for its proxies to evade blocking.
Now, Telegram is also an important part of military communication in Russia. Probably not that often for the chain-of-command, but there are dozens of channels that cover frontline news and war in details, and these somewhat independent media outlets are as important to the Russian government as they are to the CIA.
- realusername 1y agoI never believed that, there's too many coincidence with his visit to Russia and the Russian state investment in Telegram at the same time.
- sam_lowry_ 1y agoIIRC, Roskomsvoboda had a project to figure out the banned IPs and ranges, and mitigations were widely discussed on habr.ru and specialized forums. The whole story unrolled in real-time and publicly. I don't think there's any doubt about its veracity.