3 ms·
> the publication didn't apply any diligence into actually reading the charges filed or investigating When that article was published, there were no charges fi
by like_any_other 1y ago
> the publication didn't apply any diligence into actually reading the charges filed or investigating
When that article was published, there were no charges filed. It was more than a year later that they were charged. And I'll ask again: which facts were false or mischaracterized? Can you be specific?
The essence of the article I linked was that:
1) Letitia's investigation was drawn out and financially ruinous.
2) She demanded all of their email records, which would have doxxed their writers.
3) The Brimelows are being investigated for using funds donated to their charity for personal expenses, which they deny.
The CNN article, as far as I could tell, contradicts none of these points. But perhaps I missed something?
- nemo 1y agoYou seem incapable of either speaking or comprehending truth, please let's never speak again.
- like_any_other 1y agoTwice I've asked you which facts the article is lying about, and twice you've refused to answer, instead merely rephrasing your accusation ("mischaracterizes the facts"). Perhaps I am incapable of comprehending truth, but for the sake of others reading this, can you tell them what precisely the lies were?