5 ms·
There is nothing to say these individuals/organizations would have followed up on their promises to set up these shell companies. They could have been stings,
by aes256 14y ago
There is nothing to say these individuals/organizations would have followed up on their promises to set up these shell companies.
They could have been stings, or even scams.
In the case of the American provider who acknowledged the purpose of the shell company might have been a front for funding terrorism, they could have just requested an upfront payment (e.g. 6 months at $5,000 per month), taken the money and ran.
- lifeisstillgood 14y agoThese people were incorporation agents - they had shopfronts and tend not to run (much) But it is possible they are running honeypots; but rather unlikely
- fsckin 14y agoWould you steal from a terrorist?
- jbelich 14y agoThat worked wonders for Doc Brown....