Some intellectual curiosity: If tariff revenue is rising, and the economy hasn’t shrunk (yet), and DOGE has returned money (recission later being authorized) t

Some intellectual curiosity: If tariff revenue is rising, and the economy hasn’t shrunk (yet), and DOGE has returned money (recission later being authorized) then some money was clearly generated. Alternatively, Doge could have been totally ineffectual and tariffs returning nothing, but this article seems to indicate otherwise. This means that less money then planned was spent. Against a null hpothesis, that indicates that the situation is "better" then doing nothing at all (at which point, the rise in government lending costs, the out of control benefit costs, and all of the other stupid crap that has been festering out there since Bill Clinton won the white house for ridiculing Bush for raising taxes comes home to roost. I'm solidly in the never-trump camp, and maybe there was an argument made after the paywall, but this feels like an ideology in search of a headline.