3 ms·
Right, but the companies still aren't going to if they don't have to. Otherwise Tesla would be doing it today. OP said: > self driving will be statistically s
by afavour 1y ago
Right, but the companies still aren't going to if they don't have to. Otherwise Tesla would be doing it today.
OP said:
> self driving will be statistically significantly better than human drivers, but because it isn't perfect we won't allow it anyway.
My contention is that it's not that everyone is a luddite, it's that while companies are legally allowed to provide quasi-self driving they have no liability for they will do exactly that. And that is what will hold us back.
- bryanlarsen 1y ago1. Tesla has been found liable in one case, there will be many more. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tesla-autopilot-crash-trial-verdict-partly-liable-rcna222344 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tesla-autopilot-crash-t... 2. There's $1000/year of potential revenue they're missing out on by not assuming liability. That's a pretty powerful incentive.