2 ms·

This is not credible without evidence.

by stickfigure 1y ago

DiggyJohnson 1y ago
I can testify this is credible. You can prove this by trying it out yourself.
- jibal 1y ago
  Your testimony isn't credible. You have made plainly false statements here.
  - DiggyJohnson 1y ago
    What on Earth?
observationist 1y ago
The evidence gets deleted. Go talk with any of the mods or former mods for right of center-left discussion forums - any deviation or disagreement with far left narratives is asking for conflict. Anything that risks brigading or attention by one of the larger leftist subs will get nuked because those smaller communities can't expend the hours needed to deal with the flood of hate and harassment they get. If you find that not credible, you haven't been paying attention - reddit is a leftist cesspit echo chamber, and the only way any dissenting viewpoints survive is through having an absurd level of micromanaging and moderator involvement, like r/conservative, or being so small as to fly under the radar and not attract notice. Centralizing forums to reddit was one of the worst things to ever happen to the internet, in retrospect. We should have stayed diverse and decentralized, and leaned into federation style community links, and made it easier for people to navigate and surface interesting unique communities, independent of the arbitrary politicization and ideological nonsense that infects reddit.
- array_key_first 1y ago
  Commenting conservative things is not against community guidelines. However, most conservative comments are against community guidelines. For example, supporting Trump is fine. Repeating what Trump says might be against community guidelines. Not because being a trump supporter is against the rules, but because trump sometimes says blatantly racist things, and that IS against the rules. It's simple to be both conservative and not rude, nasty, racist, sexist, etc. Many influential conservative voices struggle with this. So they get banned, and, by value of following their lead, their followers. Another example, on a bigger scale. Trump can be upset about losing an election. That's allowed. But Trump cannot advocate people go cause violence because of it. That's not allowed, and we had days in court because of that.
  - vkou 1y ago
    > Repeating what Trump says might be against community guidelines. For the irony-cherry on top, repeating what he says is also often against r/conservative guidelines - they'll happily ban you for it, because a lot of the things Trump says are also really fucking stupid and contradictory, and his supporters don't like to be reminded that the emperor's naked.
  - ryandrake 1y ago
    Exactly. The sibling replier[1] summed it up. Nobody is getting their accounts nuked for mere "conservative views." They're getting their accounts nuked for heinous views that are against Reddit's rules, whether related to politics or not. 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45530566 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45530566
  - mlrtime 1y ago
    [flagged]

This is not credible without evidence.

DiggyJohnson 1y ago

I can testify this is credible. You can prove this by trying it out yourself.

jibal 1y ago
Your testimony isn't credible. You have made plainly false statements here.
- DiggyJohnson 1y ago
  What on Earth?

observationist 1y ago

The evidence gets deleted. Go talk with any of the mods or former mods for right of center-left discussion forums - any deviation or disagreement with far left narratives is asking for conflict. Anything that risks brigading or attention by one of the larger leftist subs will get nuked because those smaller communities can't expend the hours needed to deal with the flood of hate and harassment they get. If you find that not credible, you haven't been paying attention - reddit is a leftist cesspit echo chamber, and the only way any dissenting viewpoints survive is through having an absurd level of micromanaging and moderator involvement, like r/conservative, or being so small as to fly under the radar and not attract notice. Centralizing forums to reddit was one of the worst things to ever happen to the internet, in retrospect. We should have stayed diverse and decentralized, and leaned into federation style community links, and made it easier for people to navigate and surface interesting unique communities, independent of the arbitrary politicization and ideological nonsense that infects reddit.

array_key_first 1y ago
Commenting conservative things is not against community guidelines. However, most conservative comments are against community guidelines. For example, supporting Trump is fine. Repeating what Trump says might be against community guidelines. Not because being a trump supporter is against the rules, but because trump sometimes says blatantly racist things, and that IS against the rules. It's simple to be both conservative and not rude, nasty, racist, sexist, etc. Many influential conservative voices struggle with this. So they get banned, and, by value of following their lead, their followers. Another example, on a bigger scale. Trump can be upset about losing an election. That's allowed. But Trump cannot advocate people go cause violence because of it. That's not allowed, and we had days in court because of that.
- vkou 1y ago
  > Repeating what Trump says might be against community guidelines. For the irony-cherry on top, repeating what he says is also often against r/conservative guidelines - they'll happily ban you for it, because a lot of the things Trump says are also really fucking stupid and contradictory, and his supporters don't like to be reminded that the emperor's naked.
- ryandrake 1y ago
  Exactly. The sibling replier[1] summed it up. Nobody is getting their accounts nuked for mere "conservative views." They're getting their accounts nuked for heinous views that are against Reddit's rules, whether related to politics or not. 1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45530566 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45530566
- mlrtime 1y ago
  [flagged]