7 ms·
It's a ripoff, and strange that Apple didn't license the design, assuming they did their homework and find the IP belonged to someone. It's not going to confus
by jopt 14y ago
It's a ripoff, and strange that Apple didn't license the design, assuming they did their homework and find the IP belonged to someone.
It's not going to confuse anyone. Zero iPads will be returned because the customers thought this was the famous Swiss wall clock they'd heard so much about.
So it doesn't have much to do with Apple v. Samsung. Let's not try so hard to make everything about that; high-resolution thinking should allow for similar but separate conflicts to exist.
- Blara 14y agoare there any numbers on how many people have returned their samsung/iPhone because they thought it was the other one? I've heard this argument time and time again but have yet to see any numbers on it.
- jopt 14y agoLate reply, sorry. There's some among the data provided to the court. IIRC Apple submitted an internal report done by Samsung, which indicated Galaxy Tabs are often returned because users thought they were buying iPads.