2 ms·
that is your opinion, and is irrelevant to the choice. practically, vercel is a company which is heavily invested in react and react's future, so, they need to
by rk06 1y ago
that is your opinion, and is irrelevant to the choice. practically, vercel is a company which is heavily invested in react and react's future, so, they need to be present.
moreover, this entire initiative looks like a way to reduce vercel's influence, so if you want to be mad, then be mad in 5 yrs, not now.
- throw-10-8 1y agoIt is also my opinion that 5 years from now Vercel will be out of business and their customers will have moved on the next hype driven VC cash laundry.
- hshdhdhehd 1y agoLike Microsoft was invested in Web standards in the ie6 days... for their own interests. To own it.
- peterspath 1y agoLike chrome is doing nowadays
- noodletheworld 1y ago> vercel is a company which is heavily invested in …people paying for react. Which is fair, but do we have bend knee and suggest they have the best interests of the react ecosystem at heart? They don’t. They are invested in: people using next.js and hosting it on vercel. If that’s not what you’re doing, their interests probably don’t align with yours.