3 ms·
>But currently it feels extremely borked from a UX perspective. It purports to be able to do this, but when you tell it to it breaks in unintuitive ways. Thank
by coldtea 1y ago
>But currently it feels extremely borked from a UX perspective. It purports to be able to do this, but when you tell it to it breaks in unintuitive ways.
Thankfully as programmers we know better and don't need to care what the UI pretends to be able to do :)
>We would rightfully stone any engineer who'd design this and then say "well obvious user error" when the user rightfully complains that they crash whenever they listen to Arrow FM.
We might curse the company and engineer who did it, but we would still use that car and do those workarounds, if doing so allowed us to get to our destination in 1/10 the regular time...
- AllegedAlec 1y ago> >But currently it feels extremely borked from a UX perspective. It purports to be able to do this, but when you tell it to it breaks in unintuitive ways. > Thankfully as programmers we know better and don't need to care what the UI pretends to be able to do :) But we do though. You can't just say "yeah they left all the foot guns in but we ought to know not to use them", especially not when the industry shills tell you those footguns are actually rocket boosters to get you to the fucking moon and back.