True, the audience has a lot to do with it, but just because something "works" doesn't mean that it's optimal. Take for instance, one of the 1st things many mi

True, the audience has a lot to do with it, but just because something "works" doesn't mean that it's optimal. Take for instance, one of the 1st things many might use the site for: downloading PHP. There's a downloads page, and then there's a Windows download page, and they're both fundamentally different. It's as if you're going to a completely different site, which breaks any continuity there was to begin with. Am I even still on php.net? Likewise, what's the utility of the tutorial[1]? It directs the user to Apache's website to download a server, even though one has been bundled with PHP for 6 months now. A server that's included by default for the sole reason of making local development easier, but they can't even keep their "newbie" tutorial up-to-date even after 6 months? Please don't get me wrong, I'm not trying php.net is /bad/; rather, I think there's room for improvement.