3 ms·
isn't this sort of a spineless law? it says Browsers must send an opt-out signal. Browsers have already had a do-not-track setting, and websites universally*
by m463 1y ago
isn't this sort of a spineless law?
it says Browsers must send an opt-out signal.
Browsers have already had a do-not-track setting, and websites universally* ignored it.
* 99%
- advisedwang 1y agoIn CA websites are already required to respect the opt-out setting implemented in the Global Privacy Control [1] extension. It's basically the same thing as do-not-track but starting from a clean slate so that the meaning of the setting in law is clearly defined. This bill basically allows the regulator to make sure everyone in CA gets this extension automatically. [1] https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa/gpc https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa/gpc
- Gigachad 1y agoDo Not Track failed because it wasn’t legally required to be respected.