3 ms·
To me, the differences between iOS and Android are insignificant. Both corporate OS suck, and there are other corporate OS that suck, too The fundamental simi
by 1vuio0pswjnm7 1y ago
To me, the differences between iOS and Android are insignificant. Both corporate OS suck, and there are other corporate OS that suck, too
The fundamental similarity is that Apple does not protect the Apple computer owner^1 from Apple anymore than Google protects Android users from Google
Like Google, Apple collects data and profits from ad services. The Apple hardware buyer becomes the product after purchase. Apple profits from selling access to the hardware owner to myriad third parties. It's always making deals
Like the one with Google we learned about in the government's antitrust case. But I digress
There was a meme something like, "Unless you're paying, you are the product". But it's also possible to pay and be the product. For example, when someone purchases an individual Windows license from Microsoft, after purchase the company is still going to _require_ them to create an "account", connect to the internet and be subjected to data collection
Both iOS and Android have "app stores" (MS copies this, too), both expect and intend these "app stores" to earn them revenue from advertising, e.g., allowing apps to do surveillance, data collections and show ads
1. who is forced to use iOS. No "unlocked" bootloaders. No custom ROMs
- port11 1y agoThis is a disingenuous take that punishes companies with better data collection practices. iOS has many toggles for disabling data collection, ad personalisation, limit apps from tracking you with more persistent techniques, and so on. I'd never defend Apple willy-nilly: they're a megacorp that defrauds the European consumer and is hostile to much I care about. But there is a world of difference between Android and iOS in terms of the protections afforded to the user. Of course most people just don't know where the toggles and settings are that protect them on iOS.
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 1y agoThere are no "toggles" that protect iOS users from data collection and surveillance by Apple Today's Apple computers try to ping Apple servers the moment they are powered on for the first time. The devices incessantly try to "phone home". Apple's definition of "privacy" does not include privacy from Apple. That is not a coincidence There is no "toggle" to enable this "convenience", i.e., usage of Apple servers, because it is, by design, on by default This is not an opinion or a perspective (a "take"). It is a fact, verifiable with tcpdump or the like One can focus on differences or one can focus on similarities. Many online commentators choose the former. But if focusing on similarities, then it is indisputably clear that Android and iOS are both designed to allow Google and Apple, respectively,^1 to conduct surveillance, data collection and provide ad services 1. Apple also allows Google to collect data from iOS users via default web search in exchange for recurring payement of several billion dollars https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/26/apples-eddy-cue-defends-default-search-contract-with-google-in-trial.html https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/26/apples-eddy-cue-defends-defa... One of the other facts that the court learned from the expert tetimony in this case is that defaults matter. If generally no one uses the "toggles", then Apple and Google operate as if they have "consent" to collect data, as if the computer owner voluntarily toggled "Allow surveillance, data collection and ads" to "ON" "In-app advertising" is a growing business for Apple https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/global-app-store-helps-developers-reach-new-heights/ https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2025/06/global-app-store-help... By design, in order to serve ads to iOS users, an app needs internet connectivity. Even when the app has no need for internet connectivity otherwise