> proven to be dangerous to others if they access the internet What does this even mean? What kind of crimes can people commit using the internet that justifie

> proven to be dangerous to others if they access the internet What does this even mean? What kind of crimes can people commit using the internet that justifies bypassing due process for public safety? There are rules on the books in Canada that allows bypassing due process to confiscate firearms from a potentially violent or mentally unstable person, but I think that is a bit — just a little bit — more justifiable as the crimes that can be committed with a gun are much more serious than the crimes you can commit with the internet. Also, the internet is almost a necessity to be a part of functioning society whereas guns are not.