>Do you consider freedom (speech, movement, self-determination and so on) equal to oppression, restriction and tyranny? GP is saying that the phrase "moral hig

>Do you consider freedom (speech, movement, self-determination and so on) equal to oppression, restriction and tyranny? GP is saying that the phrase "moral high ground" presupposes an objective definition of "up" in morality. You can't cite a particular person's subjective moral "up" to disagree with them. Whether any given person values freedom or oppression more highly doesn't say anything about which one is objectively more moral, if any. Besides that, do you think it unthinkable that a person would approve of some amount of oppression and restriction being placed on them in favor of achieving some goal?