> You can not deal with toxic waste easily, as all attempts to do so have shown. This is, factually speaking, not what attempts have shown. cf. France, cf. Can

> You can not deal with toxic waste easily, as all attempts to do so have shown. This is, factually speaking, not what attempts have shown. cf. France, cf. Canada. > The comparison is invalid in the first place. It's not about nuclear vs fossil This topic of discussion started with someone explicitly making the comparison about exactly that.