You see a large % of failures, but you're drawing an unsupported conclusion. We all agree, the people that _feel_ the most productivity spike are the sub-par e

You see a large % of failures, but you're drawing an unsupported conclusion. We all agree, the people that _feel_ the most productivity spike are the sub-par engineers. That shouldn't be controversial, and it's even predictable. But their volume can't be taken as an argument one way or the other. The question is, are there _any_ good engineers that don't just feel more productive, but objectively are.