Finally a statement that is based, excuse the language. Many tried to find false compromises with references to digital IDs. That doesn't work, you just had an

Finally a statement that is based, excuse the language. Many tried to find false compromises with references to digital IDs. That doesn't work, you just had an example of states demonstrating their desire to invade private communications. States lack the maturity for that. An infrastructure with state IDs is not possible because we have no privacy protections. I don't want a simple legislative change to put myself and my data in danger. I works if a small state uses it for digital government services. If it were established in the EU, the fight for privacy would be even harder. So no to state issued IDs as well.