5 ms·

If you do a dot plot on the Nvidia earnings vs what was expected, it's too perfect. The expectations move around, but you could plot a perfectly straight line t

If you do a dot plot on the Nvidia earnings vs what was expected, it's too perfect. The expectations move around, but you could plot a perfectly straight line through it. Nothing, not China, not tariffs added any natural variations.

dustbunny 1y ago
What does that imply?
- zerosizedweasle 1y ago
  Whenever a company is aligning their earnings and always beating them, you should ask questions. If you've ever read the book "Smartest guys in the Room" that's the biggest tell.
  - dustbunny 1y ago
    I'm asking you to be explicit, ie: "I think Nvidia is cooking their books and committing fraud". That's what your saying right?
    - zerosizedweasle 1y ago
      There is a lot of suspicious behavior, and if the top analyst at Morgan Stanley is saying it - their chief investment officer - then I think there is at least some smoke. The suspicious behavior could be considered the flames.
    - happymellon 1y ago
      I think so. It's a market where line has to go up, so bad behaviour is demanded. Giving OpenAI $30 billion, so that they can spend $30 billion on GPUs, so that you can now report your own $30 billion as revenue is market manipulation and an attempt to get others to invest in this "$300 billion" market, so OpenAI can pay their bonuses and can give Nvidia their 40%. LLMs might be really good at converting your USB debugging script from Python to Go, and it might do a passable enough translation that you don't need to use Google translate but that's not a $300 billion market.
      - downrightmike 1y ago
        Amazon cooked their books into the negative for years and only recently went positive. All nvidia has to do it pay out the gov't ( like they already are) and things are fine.
pfannkuchen 1y ago
This would be a fabulously dramatic plot twist. I’ve never considered this as a possibility before, but between Altman orchestrating some masterful play to bring the next transformative technology to market first for massive profit, and Altman orchestrating some masterful manipulation to scam everyone, the latter feels massively more plausible. Are all the people who are super duper worried about GenAI and safety in reality a planted foil? Men cowering in front of the fake paper tiger, so men further away say “this tiger is powerful, just look at how those men are cowering before it”.
- DebtDeflation 1y ago
  Meanwhile, there seems to be a massive pivot underway at OpenAI away from AGI hype and model development overall and towards just becoming a product company that monetizes their current tech via mundane stuff like Instant Checkout.
- tyleo 1y ago
  I think this is a malice vs stupidity thing. I think Altman—and most billionaires it’s in fashion to dislike r.n.—truly mean well. It seems closer to cult-like thinking. Most folks joining a cult are trying to improve their lives. They end up in a thought bubble though that often leads to worse decision making. I think AI is useful but I don’t think it’s the multi-trillion dollar cash geyser the some of these billionaires are hoping for.

dustbunny 1y ago

What does that imply?

zerosizedweasle 1y ago
Whenever a company is aligning their earnings and always beating them, you should ask questions. If you've ever read the book "Smartest guys in the Room" that's the biggest tell.
- dustbunny 1y ago
  I'm asking you to be explicit, ie: "I think Nvidia is cooking their books and committing fraud". That's what your saying right?
  - zerosizedweasle 1y ago
    There is a lot of suspicious behavior, and if the top analyst at Morgan Stanley is saying it - their chief investment officer - then I think there is at least some smoke. The suspicious behavior could be considered the flames.
  - happymellon 1y ago
    I think so. It's a market where line has to go up, so bad behaviour is demanded. Giving OpenAI $30 billion, so that they can spend $30 billion on GPUs, so that you can now report your own $30 billion as revenue is market manipulation and an attempt to get others to invest in this "$300 billion" market, so OpenAI can pay their bonuses and can give Nvidia their 40%. LLMs might be really good at converting your USB debugging script from Python to Go, and it might do a passable enough translation that you don't need to use Google translate but that's not a $300 billion market.
    - downrightmike 1y ago
      Amazon cooked their books into the negative for years and only recently went positive. All nvidia has to do it pay out the gov't ( like they already are) and things are fine.

pfannkuchen 1y ago

This would be a fabulously dramatic plot twist. I’ve never considered this as a possibility before, but between Altman orchestrating some masterful play to bring the next transformative technology to market first for massive profit, and Altman orchestrating some masterful manipulation to scam everyone, the latter feels massively more plausible. Are all the people who are super duper worried about GenAI and safety in reality a planted foil? Men cowering in front of the fake paper tiger, so men further away say “this tiger is powerful, just look at how those men are cowering before it”.

DebtDeflation 1y ago
Meanwhile, there seems to be a massive pivot underway at OpenAI away from AGI hype and model development overall and towards just becoming a product company that monetizes their current tech via mundane stuff like Instant Checkout.
tyleo 1y ago
I think this is a malice vs stupidity thing. I think Altman—and most billionaires it’s in fashion to dislike r.n.—truly mean well. It seems closer to cult-like thinking. Most folks joining a cult are trying to improve their lives. They end up in a thought bubble though that often leads to worse decision making. I think AI is useful but I don’t think it’s the multi-trillion dollar cash geyser the some of these billionaires are hoping for.