3 ms·
First Apple would need to be considered a monopoly. They're clearly not a monopoly since there are so many smart phone alternatives available.
by nostromo 14y ago
First Apple would need to be considered a monopoly. They're clearly not a monopoly since there are so many smart phone alternatives available.
- MatthewPhillips 14y agoThat's not true, you don't have to be a monopoly to get in trouble for anti-competitive behavior, you just have to be... participating in anti-competitive behavior.
- bluedanieru 14y agoYes, but what's anti-competitive depends on what your market position is.
- fpgeek 14y agoTrue, but a company that is already the target of one antitrust lawsuit probably has less leeway than it used to.