3 ms·
That's silly. The y2k bug was because the year was written as 65, instead of the full year being 1965, so information was lost. Writing 2025 has no missing info
by hahn-kev 1y ago
That's silly. The y2k bug was because the year was written as 65, instead of the full year being 1965, so information was lost. Writing 2025 has no missing information.