> ... into "report" with no evidence or reference If one takes a few minutes to review the NIST report [1], one will indeed find evidence and references detail

> ... into "report" with no evidence or reference If one takes a few minutes to review the NIST report [1], one will indeed find evidence and references detailed in the footnotes. Without judgment, I ask: How did you miss this? I'm certainly not asking you to defend yourself, which would likely trigger rationalization [2]. I am asking you to sincerely try to figure it out for yourself. Under what conditions do you have the ability to admit that you are wrong, even if only to yourself? [1]: https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI... [2]: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Rationalization https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Rationa...