4 ms·
I think the main concern with a keyczar-like API is that we won't be able to create one that significant numbers of websites would actually use. Why not try to
by romaniv 14y ago
I think the main concern with a keyczar-like API is that we won't be able to create one that significant numbers of websites would actually use.
Why not try to create one that significant number of users will use? Stuff like automatic verification of files using a hash or signing and verifying GPG signatures on web-based message boards would be tremendously useful and don't require much support on the website side.
- briansmith 14y agoPlease see my other responses in this thread. I recommend people to write up proposals for such APIs and submit them to the W3C working group. It should be simple to specify them because you should literally be able to specify them directly in code based on the low-level API.