2 ms·
Not sure I understand what you're saying. * THC threshold for a first-time user to register as "completely stoned": $foo * THC level of someone who smoked the
by jancsika 1y ago
Not sure I understand what you're saying.
* THC threshold for a first-time user to register as "completely stoned": $foo
* THC level of someone who smoked the maximum amount they could 30 days ago, and hasn't smoked or eaten an edible since: $bar
Are you saying that $bar >= $foo?
- estimator7292 1y agoThe degree to which any given dose of THC affects an individual varies so wildly as to be completely useless as a baseline. To guarantee that 100% of debilitated users are detected, the threshold would have to be so low as to also detect a heavy user who smoked a joint two days ago. Your argument is built on the supposition that there's a hard lower boundary on debilitating dosage. There is no such magic number, or it is nearly indistinguishable from zero.
- 0_____0 1y agoIt's sort of shocking. Compared to alcohol, where someone might plausibly get as drunk off of 1 drink as someone else might from 5, with THC the plausible ratio is more like 1:50 between naive and heavy users (IME).