> This article has a somewhat alarmist tone, but isn't this just Starlink working as intended? The unexpected accumulation of metals in the stratosphere, discu

> This article has a somewhat alarmist tone, but isn't this just Starlink working as intended? The unexpected accumulation of metals in the stratosphere, discussed in the article, is clearly not intended. > It seems much better for an old non-functional Starlink satellite to burn up in the atmosphere instead of continuing in an uncontrolled orbit. I believe most burn-ups are controlled intentional deorbits. This is irrelevant to metals like aluminium accumulating in the stratosphere.