3 ms·
You say it's "not moral or right"; so, what would you suggest? I agree applying the lowest common denominator is not necessarily the best (nor fair) way to do i
by 5555624 1y ago
You say it's "not moral or right"; so, what would you suggest? I agree applying the lowest common denominator is not necessarily the best (nor fair) way to do it; but, how do you handle it?
Do we agree that there is some level that effects everyone, even if that level is different? Do we require all THC users -- smoking, edibles, vaping, topicals, etc -- be tested to determine the level where they become impaired?
- ChromaticPanic 1y agoDoing nothing is a perfectly valid option too. We don't have to react to and legislate every single thing.
- unethical_ban 1y agoOr, lacking evidence, punish people based on fault and liability that is defined. Speeding is speeding, causing a crash is causing a crash.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]