3 ms·
edit: okay I misunderstood what everyone meant
by shizcakes 1y ago
edit: okay I misunderstood what everyone meant
- organsnyder 1y agoI don't see anyone worrying about planetary mass. I'd be more concerned about atmospheric effects.
- palata 1y agoIs that what you say when you litter? "I don't see a problem with plastic in the ocean, it came from the Earth in the first place".
- lxgr 1y ago> please recall that the mass of de-orbiting man-made satellites came from the earth in the first place. Then again, so are CFCs, CO2, radioactive materials... Just because some elements naturally occur on Earth doesn't mean we're completely insensitive to where they end up. (That said, I have no idea if atmospheric Aluminium is actually a problem or not.)
- VBprogrammer 1y agoI was watching a video the other day which happened to mention that sodium lasers are used to create artificial stars, used for calibration of adaptive optics in ground based telescopes. This works because one particular layer of the upper atmosphere is rich in sodium due to impact with sodium rich debris. Obviously it requires a more scientific analysis but it does seem to me that burning a lot of shit on the atmosphere might be problematic.
- dylan604 1y agoIs that really what people are concerned about though?