5 ms·

This absolutely happened and is not speculation. I can't find the emails from the individuals that emailed me, but I did find my email to the board of directors

This absolutely happened and is not speculation. I can't find the emails from the individuals that emailed me, but I did find my email to the board of directors asking that the website language be changed because people had pinged me thinking I would be getting money, or that the money would go to fund rubygems.org. At the time I'd sent the email I was unaware Ruby Together was on HN front page (and that's why people were pinging me)

steveklabnik 1y ago
Okay, if you got emails, you got emails, but I did not. I absolutely wouldn't want people to think that I'd be getting the money, so I think clarifying it was a good thing, regardless.
krainboltgreene 1y ago
It's so weird of you to jump in like this, man.
- hitekker 1y ago
  Can you explain what you find so weird? From what I can tell, the GP is adding useful information using his firsthand experience.
  - krainboltgreene 1y ago
    Did they? No evidence and worded to suggest Steve didn’t experience it, that counts as useful information now?
    - mijoharas 1y ago
      I think you may have misread it. The original claim is: > This resulted in a nonzero number of donors believing they were funding the work of people like Steve Klabnik, Aaron Patterson, and Sarah Mei, when in fact only Andre was being paid at the time. Steve said "that didn't happen to me" and then Aaron said "that definitely did happen to me". Seems pretty relevant. I don't think he was claiming steve was wrong in not having heard that, but Aaron was saying it did happen to him, so the claim is true. (and in terms of evidence, do you want him to share the emails he got? A first hand account seems enough evidence to me) Seems pretty unambiguous, and a good reason to chime in.
- veeti 1y ago
  It's weird for people to try and set the record straight when you mention them by name?
  - krainboltgreene 1y ago
    He didn't set any record straight. Why are you people imagining content?

steveklabnik 1y ago

Okay, if you got emails, you got emails, but I did not. I absolutely wouldn't want people to think that I'd be getting the money, so I think clarifying it was a good thing, regardless.

krainboltgreene 1y ago

It's so weird of you to jump in like this, man.

hitekker 1y ago
Can you explain what you find so weird? From what I can tell, the GP is adding useful information using his firsthand experience.
- krainboltgreene 1y ago
  Did they? No evidence and worded to suggest Steve didn’t experience it, that counts as useful information now?
  - mijoharas 1y ago
    I think you may have misread it. The original claim is: > This resulted in a nonzero number of donors believing they were funding the work of people like Steve Klabnik, Aaron Patterson, and Sarah Mei, when in fact only Andre was being paid at the time. Steve said "that didn't happen to me" and then Aaron said "that definitely did happen to me". Seems pretty relevant. I don't think he was claiming steve was wrong in not having heard that, but Aaron was saying it did happen to him, so the claim is true. (and in terms of evidence, do you want him to share the emails he got? A first hand account seems enough evidence to me) Seems pretty unambiguous, and a good reason to chime in.
veeti 1y ago
It's weird for people to try and set the record straight when you mention them by name?
- krainboltgreene 1y ago
  He didn't set any record straight. Why are you people imagining content?