> They might have an advantage of a few drinks compared to a regular person, but they often close that gap. When the legal limit is 0.08 or lower, that's the d

> They might have an advantage of a few drinks compared to a regular person, but they often close that gap. When the legal limit is 0.08 or lower, that's the difference between "too drunk for a non-alcoholic to drive" and "perfectly fine for an alcoholic", isn't it? Yet no court would accept that as an argument.