> that also argues to neuter government power The article states that the government did not have this power to begin with! > Apple insists that it is only co

> that also argues to neuter government power The article states that the government did not have this power to begin with! > Apple insists that it is only complying with lawful orders, which is patently untrue. Pam Bondi has no authority to order the censorship of this legal speech tool, which is likely why she didn't seek a court order and instead merely rage-tweeted about it. This was sufficient to get Apple CEO Tim Cook [...] to cave in.