4 ms·
You could just use a C compiler to write the assembly code from this, and it'd be far less buggy. Before there were LLMs, there were about 65 years of other pr
by nostrademons 1y ago
You could just use a C compiler to write the assembly code from this, and it'd be far less buggy.
Before there were LLMs, there were about 65 years of other program-writing-programs to save labor.
- f1shy 1y agoAs simple as gcc -S heap-lisp.c
- kazinator 1y agoGenerally speaking, program-writing-programs (when they are not either buggy, or being updated to a new version) predictably write the same thing from the same specification according to rules. LLMs do not replace program-writing-programs; they should be used to work with program-writing-programs, not as a replacement. E.g. I wouldn't use an LLM to convert a grammar to LR parsing tables, but perhaps to get help with the grammar file.