4 ms·
There's always somebody predicting an apocalypse. This guarantees that, regardless of what happens, there's somebody who can claim they were right. Which makes
by karlkloss 1y ago
There's always somebody predicting an apocalypse.
This guarantees that, regardless of what happens, there's somebody who can claim they were right.
Which makes those predictions completely useless.
You could as well read your horoscope.
- newyankee 1y agoThe funny thing though is that on balance I believe that since the launch of GPT to the public almost 3 years back, I feel GPT has delivered more than it has disappointed. I still feel that we should run into limitations soon and may be GPT5 is an example of that. Surely the tech still has a long way to go and keep improving especially as the money has attracted everyone to work on it in different ways that were not considered important till now but the financial side of things have to correct a bit for healthy growth
- kemitchell 1y agoYou've given the argument from fallacy, dismissing an argument without any reference to its content, but only to its conclusion. The existence of bad arguments for a proposition doesn't condemn all other arguments for the same. The question is whether any particular argument's strong or weak. That's a matter of evidence and reasoning.