That’s the problem with communication, you for instance cannot be listening if you think what I say is what these people say. I said truth and law, not by some

That’s the problem with communication, you for instance cannot be listening if you think what I say is what these people say. I said truth and law, not by someone’s god. In fact, I like to make it clear thoughts feelings and beliefs are never worth violating the sanctity of others. Truth and law however are the right to resolve violation, and violation is an instrument of resolution (of those who enable and perpetuate, to put to an end at every expense of those culpable.) Let me just outline what I call “a righteous rule of law” in so few worlds: One principled upon Truth, for if it is not true it has no place in law. One which protects the innocent (those not culpable) from violation by will or neglect. One entitled by domain, one competent and uncorrupted before law. And really that’s it, though we must spend volumes of text uncompressing this before being understood in a useful common frame of reference.