4 ms·
Which is why the original comment you replied to characterized it as content and not art. But this has gone pretty much full circle already.
by ricardobeat 1y ago
Which is why the original comment you replied to characterized it as content and not art. But this has gone pretty much full circle already.
- estearum 1y agoSo apparently: The Sistine Chapel: Content, not art The Mona Lisa: Content, not art The Guggenheim: Content, not art David: Content, not art Geurnica: Content, not art Symphony No. 5 in C Minor, Op. 67: Content, not art I understand why the original comment said it, and my response is a simple explanation as to why the original comment was very obviously incorrect.