> Other problems though such as default function parameters are less likely to be addressed (it seems to me). It's unlikely to be addressed given that Google s

> Other problems though such as default function parameters are less likely to be addressed (it seems to me). It's unlikely to be addressed given that Google style guide forbids using default function parameters even in C++. > This is a problem because it means lots of code will be written in which there are implicit defaults (just pass 0!) "Just pass 0" is not a good way to implement defaults.