3 ms·
This post's description of the report it's denouncing does not match what I got out of actually reading that report myself.
by tbrownaw 1y ago
This post's description of the report it's denouncing does not match what I got out of actually reading that report myself.
- Levitz 1y agoIn a funny way, even the comments on the post here don't match what the post actually says. The writer of the post tries to frame it as an attack towards open source, which is honestly a hard to believe story, whereas the comments here correctly (in my opinion) consider the possible problems Chinese influence might pose.
- rainsford 1y agoYeah this blog post seems pretty misleading. The first couple of paragraphs of the post made a big deal that the NIST report contained "...no evidence of malicious code, backdoors, or data exfiltration" in the model, which is irrelevant because that wasn't a claim NIST actually made in the report. But if all you read was the blog post, you'd be convinced NIST was claiming the presence of backdoors without any evidence.
- a_victorp 1y agoIt does match what I factually got reading the report