5 ms·

I have tried, but can't seem to find a link explaining what flavour.me is. I hope moo know what they have bought.

sp332 14y ago
This seems a decent description: “If Condé Nast built FriendFeed.” --Venturebeat It lets you make a website that pulls in content from your Facebook, Twitter etc, and themes it they way you like. Then that site becomes your "digital presence" which is jargon for "the site for people find out more about you, and maybe talk to you". All this is described on the homepage http://flavors.me/ http://flavors.me/
kmfrk 14y ago
Remember about.me? These guys basically copied flavors.me. It's a really, really easy personal website CMS with support for all conceivable web services. With a huge focus on design. It allows everyone and their dog to set up a website - with flavors.me hosting it - and it's really hard to make an ugly webpage. Companies, brands, celebrities, et a. can also use it to great effect. Here are some example websites: http://flavors.me/community http://flavors.me/community. Someone compared it to FriendFeed, which I guess is fair, but I'd consider it more of a homepage than a social feed. It's a good way to find out where that person hangs out online - or to use as a portfolio/CV.
- chimeracoder 14y ago
  I have to say, this is one great example of how branding/messaging can make a difference. GP had to ask the question, whereas for about.me, there's no need - as soon as I go to the homepage, I see thumbnail links to pages like http://about.me/baratunde http://about.me/baratunde - so I can see pretty clearly and obviously what the site actually does. From what it seems, flavors.me seems like it supports more useful features, so it's sad that the branding doesn't present itself in as compelling a manner.
  - kbourgoin 14y ago
    It's even worse than that. The big difference between the two was press coverage. The GP actually has it backwards. flavors.me was out well before about.me started, but when about.me launched they generated a massive amount of buzz, in particular on TC. It effectively left flavors.ms in the dust even though flavors was always the better product. Better IMO, of course. edit: GP didn't get it wrong, I just read it backwards. Still, sad to see hype trump quality.
    - chimeracoder 14y ago
      I hate it when this happens. As a startup guy, I appreciate the importance of design, press presentation, and marketing, but as an engineer, it kills me a bit inside every time I see a flashy, well-hyped, inferior product win out over an understated, modest, superior one.

sp332 14y ago

This seems a decent description: “If Condé Nast built FriendFeed.” --Venturebeat It lets you make a website that pulls in content from your Facebook, Twitter etc, and themes it they way you like. Then that site becomes your "digital presence" which is jargon for "the site for people find out more about you, and maybe talk to you". All this is described on the homepage http://flavors.me/ http://flavors.me/

kmfrk 14y ago

Remember about.me? These guys basically copied flavors.me. It's a really, really easy personal website CMS with support for all conceivable web services. With a huge focus on design. It allows everyone and their dog to set up a website - with flavors.me hosting it - and it's really hard to make an ugly webpage. Companies, brands, celebrities, et a. can also use it to great effect. Here are some example websites: http://flavors.me/community http://flavors.me/community. Someone compared it to FriendFeed, which I guess is fair, but I'd consider it more of a homepage than a social feed. It's a good way to find out where that person hangs out online - or to use as a portfolio/CV.

chimeracoder 14y ago
I have to say, this is one great example of how branding/messaging can make a difference. GP had to ask the question, whereas for about.me, there's no need - as soon as I go to the homepage, I see thumbnail links to pages like http://about.me/baratunde http://about.me/baratunde - so I can see pretty clearly and obviously what the site actually does. From what it seems, flavors.me seems like it supports more useful features, so it's sad that the branding doesn't present itself in as compelling a manner.
- kbourgoin 14y ago
  It's even worse than that. The big difference between the two was press coverage. The GP actually has it backwards. flavors.me was out well before about.me started, but when about.me launched they generated a massive amount of buzz, in particular on TC. It effectively left flavors.ms in the dust even though flavors was always the better product. Better IMO, of course. edit: GP didn't get it wrong, I just read it backwards. Still, sad to see hype trump quality.
  - chimeracoder 14y ago
    I hate it when this happens. As a startup guy, I appreciate the importance of design, press presentation, and marketing, but as an engineer, it kills me a bit inside every time I see a flashy, well-hyped, inferior product win out over an understated, modest, superior one.