4 ms·
Okay, weird to call it S3, if it is just object storage somewhere else. Its like saying "EKS" if you mean Kubernetes, or talking about "self hosting EC2" by ins
by andix 1y ago
Okay, weird to call it S3, if it is just object storage somewhere else. Its like saying "EKS" if you mean Kubernetes, or talking about "self hosting EC2" by installing qemu.
- miduil 1y ago> weird to call it S3 I feel that is a bit of an unfair assessment. AWS S3 was the first S3-compatible API provider, nowadays most cloud providers and bunch of self hosted software supports S3(-Compatible) APIs. Call it Object Store (which is a bit unspecific) or call it S3-Compatible. EKS and EC2 on the other hand are a set of tools and services, operated by AWS for you - with some APIs surrounding them that are not replicated by any other party (at least for production use).
- bobmcnamara 1y agoYou can even do S3-on-ZFS
- niles 1y agoWhich solutions do you find stable?
- bobmcnamara 1y agoWouldn't consider myself qualified to answer, but I'm not aware of any problems we had with our Oracle ZFS storage appliance.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- prmoustache 1y agoGarage talks the same S3 API.
- smartbit 1y agoGarageFS S3 compatibility https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/reference-manual/s3-compatibility/ https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/reference-manua... vs - Openstack Swift - CEPH Object Gateway - Riak CS - OpenIO SeaweedFS vs. JuiceFS https://juicefs.com/docs/community/comparison/juicefs_vs_seaweedfs/ https://juicefs.com/docs/community/comparison/juicefs_vs_sea...
- brandon272 1y agoS3 is both a product and basically an API standard.