You arent wrong to note the deficiencies in the linked source. Still, did you click through to read the consumer reports article this blog post acrually about?

You arent wrong to note the deficiencies in the linked source. Still, did you click through to read the consumer reports article this blog post acrually about? It itemizes the claims of seed oil opponents, then links to peer reviewed studies to refute most of them. All seem to be from reputable journals. None of the linked papers note that they've been retracted. Nobody is citing Facebook here, unlike some proponents of the theory that seed oil is the number one cause of "inflamation" or whatever. That's pretty solid reporting, and exceeds my standard of evidence when it comes to health reporting for the most part. Admittedly, linking to the blog instead of the actual article was silly.