4 ms·
Yup The fundamental problem with the Drake equation is that it's frequentist, not Bayesian Hence why you get too high sensitivity to parameters you have no wa
by raverbashing 1y ago
Yup
The fundamental problem with the Drake equation is that it's frequentist, not Bayesian
Hence why you get too high sensitivity to parameters you have no way of having an estimate with a small margin of error
We "don't care" about how many civilisations are out there, we care to the point where we can interact with them.
As mentioned, it has several assumptions. "Rate of birth of sun like stars" means nothing. You can "always" have an exception for life that will throw the data off: "star too bright but with a hot Jupiter tidally locked in front of your moon, shielding it" etc
- antonvs 1y ago> star too bright but with a hot Jupiter tidally locked in front of your moon, shielding it It seems unlikely that such exceptions would amount to more than part of a reasonable margin of error.
- raverbashing 1y agoIt is very likely that Earth itself is the exception of the exception and is part of a "margin of error"