3 ms·
If we step back and examine LLMs more broadly (beyond our personal use cases, beyond "economic impact", beyond the underlying computer science) what we are larg
by arthurofbabylon 1y ago
If we step back and examine LLMs more broadly (beyond our personal use cases, beyond "economic impact", beyond the underlying computer science) what we are largely looking at is an emerging means of collaboration. I am not an expert computer scientist, and yet I can "collaborate" (I almost feel bad using this term) with expert computer scientists when my LLM helps me design my particular algorithm. I am not an expert on Indonesian surf breaks, yet I tap into an existing knowledge base when I query my LLM while planning the trip. I am very naive about a lot of things and thankfully there are numerous ways to integrate with experts and improve my capacity to engage in whatever I am naive about, LLMs offering the latest ground-breaking method.
This is the most appropriate lens through which to assess AI and its impact on open source, intellectual property, and other proprietary assets. Alongside this new form of collaboration comes a restructuring of power. It's not clear to me how our various societies will design this restructuring (so far we are collectively doing nearly nothing) but the restructuring of these power structures is not a technical process; it is cultural and political. Engineers will only offer so much help here.
For the most part, it is up to us to collectively orchestrate the new power structure, and I am still seeing very little literature on the topic. If anyone has a reading list, please share!
- visarga 1y ago> what we are largely looking at is an emerging means of collaboration. They surpass open source, "out-open source-opensouce" by learning skills everywhere and opening them up for anyone who needs them later.
- goku12 1y agoIt's owned by a few rich corporations and individuals. It isn't available to anyone - only to those they choose and are ready to pay them. And it isn't open source at all, because open source is not reuse without any obligations (even under permissive licenses). And let's not forget that they 'open' only FOSS works and individual works. They never expose proprietary IP belonging to rich corporations. It isn't an emerging method of collaboration - it's another method for wealth consolidation.
- 48terry 1y agoMe copying and pasting your post verbatim to put on my blog under my name: "I greatly enjoyed collaborating with arthurofbabylon on this piece."
- arthurofbabylon 1y agoForget about copying and pasting – the act of reading it is on the spectrum of collaboration. But thanks for the citation.