3 ms·
I'm still not really convinced. Look at it from my perspective: I have my website, BSky isn't compatible with the web, therefore I would have to provide two dif
by James_K 1y ago
I'm still not really convinced. Look at it from my perspective: I have my website, BSky isn't compatible with the web, therefore I would have to provide two different versions of all content I publish to satisfy someone else's protocol. It's very annoying. It would be simpler and more effective if it was built on existing web technologies. The only actually new things AT and BSky provide is a signature scheme for content, and the ability to store replies, follows, and likes. You manage most of that in as a few HTML meta tags à la OpenGraph. The other parts of it already exist, those being a web-page designer and an indexer.