4 ms·
>was rich in volatile elements essential for life, such as hydrogen, carbon and sulphur. Today years old on learning that 'carbon' is a 'volatile element'. (I
by ricksunny 1y ago
>was rich in volatile elements essential for life, such as hydrogen, carbon and sulphur.
Today years old on learning that 'carbon' is a 'volatile element'. (I come to learn that astrogeology has a unique definition of volatile).
• The summary's own source article points makes no reference to carbon being volatile.
• The wikipedia article for 'volatiles' in the astrogeological sense makes no reference to carbon being volatile https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatile_(astrogeology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatile_(astrogeology) . Similarly, the wikipedia article for 'refractory', posed as the astrogeological opposite of volatile, does not place carbon at all in the spectrum of volatile to refractory.
• Contra: at least two papers do refer to carbon being a volatile element.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05276-x https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05276-x and https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18262 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18262
[shrug]
- eep_social 1y agoI take this as “volatile” in the sense that it bonds easily with other molecules
- brianpan 1y agoAstrophysicsts would also call these "metals" (anything heavier than helium) so don't read too much into it. :D https://sentinelmission.org/astrophysics-glossary/metallicity-in-astronomy/ https://sentinelmission.org/astrophysics-glossary/metallicit...
- ricksunny 1y agoThank you, that does make me feel at the same time better as an individual and sadder about my expectations for the astrophysicists’ ability to draw anything resembling reasonable conclusions about the makeup of the celestial bodies.
- brianpan 1y agoThere are different kinds of scientists to do that.