2 ms·

There's more words than just the headline. You don't have to agree with them, but they're there.

• charcircuit 1y ago
  If you understood my comment you would understand that I don't agree with them. If you are trying to passively aggressively call me out for not reading reading article (of which I did), do so directly.
  • z0r 1y ago
    You could engage with the article and explain why you don't agree with the argument that is being made - or you could simply leave no comment at all. That is the hidden subtext of the comment you are replying to here.
  • mtlmtlmtlmtl 1y ago
    What is there to understand about it? You don't make an argument, just a shallow dismissal. There's nothing about your comment that indicates you read TFA.
  • gdulli 1y ago
    The article made a case. You didn't refute it or make your own, you just said "nuh uh".
    • charcircuit 1y ago
      >you just said "nuh uh". The article doesn't make a case. They are just saying "nuh uh" to the decision the court made.
      • digitalPhonix 1y ago
        There's a 30ish page (not including all the legal template) brief explaining their arguement. How is that not making a case? There's even a excerpt from the brief going over one of their arguments.