3 ms·

It’s all very much simpler to this. There are those in this world who will actually literally (not jackass joke about fair trade injustice) sacrifice an “innoc

It’s all very much simpler to this. There are those in this world who will actually literally (not jackass joke about fair trade injustice) sacrifice an “innocent” for power (their own or any other), there are those who will do no such thing, and there are those who would murder a man before letting such things stand. I advocate a righteous rule of law. I advocate moral and lawful violence as a resolution to the lawless violation of those not culpable for anything so fuck all. I don’t care what others get away with.

ben_w 1y ago
> I advocate a righteous rule of law. I advocate moral and lawful violence as a resolution to the lawless violation of those not culpable for anything so fuck all. Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Millions throughout history have spoken as you do now. Both Kirk and his alledged assassin. Militant vegans (some more metaphorical than others) to abortion clinic bombers. Crusades and conquistadors and those attacked by each.
- sunscream89 1y ago
  That’s the problem with communication, you for instance cannot be listening if you think what I say is what these people say. I said truth and law, not by someone’s god. In fact, I like to make it clear thoughts feelings and beliefs are never worth violating the sanctity of others. Truth and law however are the right to resolve violation, and violation is an instrument of resolution (of those who enable and perpetuate, to put to an end at every expense of those culpable.) Let me just outline what I call “a righteous rule of law” in so few worlds: One principled upon Truth, for if it is not true it has no place in law. One which protects the innocent (those not culpable) from violation by will or neglect. One entitled by domain, one competent and uncorrupted before law. And really that’s it, though we must spend volumes of text uncompressing this before being understood in a useful common frame of reference.

ben_w 1y ago

> I advocate a righteous rule of law. I advocate moral and lawful violence as a resolution to the lawless violation of those not culpable for anything so fuck all. Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius. Millions throughout history have spoken as you do now. Both Kirk and his alledged assassin. Militant vegans (some more metaphorical than others) to abortion clinic bombers. Crusades and conquistadors and those attacked by each.

sunscream89 1y ago
That’s the problem with communication, you for instance cannot be listening if you think what I say is what these people say. I said truth and law, not by someone’s god. In fact, I like to make it clear thoughts feelings and beliefs are never worth violating the sanctity of others. Truth and law however are the right to resolve violation, and violation is an instrument of resolution (of those who enable and perpetuate, to put to an end at every expense of those culpable.) Let me just outline what I call “a righteous rule of law” in so few worlds: One principled upon Truth, for if it is not true it has no place in law. One which protects the innocent (those not culpable) from violation by will or neglect. One entitled by domain, one competent and uncorrupted before law. And really that’s it, though we must spend volumes of text uncompressing this before being understood in a useful common frame of reference.