> Do you see the issue here when I frame it this way? Honestly no. Newton mechanics can be accurate to 20 decimal places, that’s currently indistinguishable f

> Do you see the issue here when I frame it this way? Honestly no. Newton mechanics can be accurate to 20 decimal places, that’s currently indistinguishable from reality in relevant and well understood contexts. Making Newtonian Mechanics actually useful. The core microeconomic assumption is never anywhere close to that accurate. It works except XYZ which doesn’t apply is acceptable, it never works isn’t.