3 ms·

HP, Canon and Epson all sell printers that use bulk ink - no cartridges, just bottles that you pour into the printer's reservoir. The handles-and-blades busine

HP, Canon and Epson all sell printers that use bulk ink - no cartridges, just bottles that you pour into the printer's reservoir. The handles-and-blades business model that is implicit when you buy a $40 printer is still utterly miserable, but it's no longer the only option. If you're willing to spend $200, you get a reliable piece of equipment that isn't constantly trying to nickel-and-dime you.

harrall 1y ago
Yeah if you can’t justify a >$200 inkjet, you may not need an inkjet. Order photos from a store instead of printing them. Get a laserjet if you just want document printing at home. If you are doing crafts, then buy a nice inkjet. The nice inkjets pay for themselves past some volume because (1) OEM ink is actually relatively cheap and (2) they are reliable.
- arresin 1y ago
  The issue with laser jets is the microplastic pollution
  - throwzasdf 1y ago
    [dead]
- dangus 1y ago
  I personally think inkjet has superior richer color printing to laser jet even for basic use like printing out websites and recipes, and it also doesn’t take up a massive amount of space and weight like a laser printer. I also don’t like the power spike that laser printers do that flickers the lights. Plus, a lot of inkjet buyers really need the scanning and copying functionality more than the printer itself. I have a ~$200 HP OfficeJet printer it’s small, has all the multi-functions I need, and has been reliable. Yes, the ink isn’t cheap. But I buy it at Costco which makes it less painful and it’s not the 1990s so printing isn’t an everyday thing. I have never had an issue with ink drying up or anything like that. I think the thing you have to understand is that customers like me are not looking for the best dollars per page, they’re just looking for something convenient so that they don’t have to print at work or go to the library. They don’t want to buy a serious appliance that can’t be lifted by a large portion of the population.
  - throwzasdf 1y ago
    [dead]

harrall 1y ago

Yeah if you can’t justify a >$200 inkjet, you may not need an inkjet. Order photos from a store instead of printing them. Get a laserjet if you just want document printing at home. If you are doing crafts, then buy a nice inkjet. The nice inkjets pay for themselves past some volume because (1) OEM ink is actually relatively cheap and (2) they are reliable.

arresin 1y ago
The issue with laser jets is the microplastic pollution
- throwzasdf 1y ago
  [dead]
dangus 1y ago
I personally think inkjet has superior richer color printing to laser jet even for basic use like printing out websites and recipes, and it also doesn’t take up a massive amount of space and weight like a laser printer. I also don’t like the power spike that laser printers do that flickers the lights. Plus, a lot of inkjet buyers really need the scanning and copying functionality more than the printer itself. I have a ~$200 HP OfficeJet printer it’s small, has all the multi-functions I need, and has been reliable. Yes, the ink isn’t cheap. But I buy it at Costco which makes it less painful and it’s not the 1990s so printing isn’t an everyday thing. I have never had an issue with ink drying up or anything like that. I think the thing you have to understand is that customers like me are not looking for the best dollars per page, they’re just looking for something convenient so that they don’t have to print at work or go to the library. They don’t want to buy a serious appliance that can’t be lifted by a large portion of the population.
- throwzasdf 1y ago
  [dead]