3 ms·
You're missing that they're pricing the value of models progressing them towards AGI, and their own use of that model for research and development. You can arg
by CuriouslyC 1y ago
You're missing that they're pricing the value of models progressing them towards AGI, and their own use of that model for research and development. You can argue the first one, and the second is probably not fully spun up yet (though you can see it's building steam fast), but it's not total fantasy economics, it's just highly optimistic because investors aren't going to buy the story from people who're hedging.
- bayarearefugee 1y ago> progressing them towards AGI I don't see any reason to believe that LLMs, as useful as they can be, ever lead to AGI. Believing this in an eventuality is frankly a religious belief.
- CuriouslyC 1y agoLLMs by themselves are not going to lead to AGI, agreed. However, there's solid reasons to believe that LLMs as orchestrators of other models could get us there. LLMs have the potential to be very good at turning natural language problems into "games" that a model like MuZero can learn to solve in a superhuman way.