3 ms·
Especially rude given, if he was feeling it was too long, he could've had an AI summarize it. But this shows a certain intellectual laziness/dishonesty and imm
by atonse 1y ago
Especially rude given, if he was feeling it was too long, he could've had an AI summarize it.
But this shows a certain intellectual laziness/dishonesty and immaturity in the response.
Someone's taken the time to write a response to your article, you can choose to learn from it (assuming it's not an angry rant), or you could just ignore it.
In fact, that completely dismisses this stupid article for me.
- watwut 1y agoI mean, using ai to summarise someone's arguments and then using ir in any way would be considerably more dishonest, lazy and rude. Like, expectation that he will treat an unsolicited email with all seriousness is absurd in the first place, but ai summarize it would be wtf.
- atonse 1y agoNot responding was a perfectly good neutral action. Instead they chose to respond with a "LOL" and saying it was too long, like they're a pretty unintellectual person. Let's agree to disagree.