2 ms·
No, not objectively good at all. If you're a neurotic obsessive who wants to pretend that all kinds of dastardly forces are trying to spy on you and your data,
by avalys 1y ago
No, not objectively good at all.
If you're a neurotic obsessive who wants to pretend that all kinds of dastardly forces are trying to spy on you and your data, then yes, you want more security checks and more permission prompts.
For literally everyone else - these are only obstacles to their intended use of the device, and every one of them is objectively worse!
Safari prompts me _every single time I use Google_ about whether I want to share my location. I literally couldn't care less whether Google knows this, and I click yes every time, but Apple, in their infinite wisdom, DOES NOT GIVE ME THE OPTION to say "Always Allow". Thanks to some overbearing, self-important privacy dweeb, no doubt, and no leadership at Apple confident enough to override them.
- fkyoureadthedoc 1y agothat's crazy, I always deny because I'm already on the damn search results at that point and don't want to repeat the search for little to no benefit.
- LPisGood 1y ago> If you're a neurotic obsessive who wants to pretend that all kinds of dastardly forces are trying to spy on you and your data I’m a bit confused here. Why do you think it’s pretending or neurotic and obsessive to believe organizations spy on our data? This has been common knowledge for at least 10 years and is central to many large business models.
- avalys 1y agoIt’s neurotic to think that it matters or harms you.