4 ms·
That's not me being misinformed. That's you intentionaly misrepresenting the situation. The question is not if the Greek could refuse. The question is was the
by StopDisinfo910 1y ago
That's not me being misinformed. That's you intentionaly misrepresenting the situation.
The question is not if the Greek could refuse. The question is was the terms put forward by "the Greek creditors", that is to say Germany, were fair and in the interest of the union as a whole. If I put a gun to your head, no one will listen if I tell them I gave you a choice you could have refused. You just had to take the bullet.
Germany basically refused to Greece what they themselves got in 1953 despite the situation being in part caused by their own complete mismanagement of the economy, a situation they have yet to fix by the way.
I don't know what is more repugnant: what they did or that there is people defending it and having so little shame they pretend others are misinformed.
- munksbeer 1y ago> I don't know what is more repugnant This is an argument from fallacy. Not worth discussing further when you give replies like this.